COVID-19: ASUU ‘Stomach Infrastructure’ Campaign And Greed, By Kabiru Danladi Lawanti

COVID-19: ASUU ‘Stomach Infrastructure’ Campaign And Greed, By Kabiru Danladi Lawanti

POLITICS DIGEST – We read, from friends, former course mates, former students and present about their views on the industrial action declared by the Academic Staff Union of Universities. Mostly not so favourable, others cross the line by resorting to abuse, blackmail and curse on ASUU (invariably their lecturers). It is difficult to stomach some of the opinions (or rather insults) you read sometimes from friends and course mates and more painful from your former students, who you sacrificed everything to train.

In my life, I experienced about 5 strike actions by the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU). I lost almost 4 years of my academic life to ASUU strikes, from my diploma to undergraduate studies. I also have experiences during my master’s degree and now PhD and I believe, the person reading this also has his own share of experience of the altercations between the Federal Government of Nigeria and the ASUU from 1980s – 2020. There is no need therefore, to over labour over the pains that come with strikes on students or their parents of the over 3 decades’ crisis in the public university system. It is also irrelevant to continue repeating the way, in these 3 decades how government reneged on agreements it signed with the Union.

The present strike, which came at a time when the world faces the novel corona virus pandemic is seen by some people as insensitive on the part of ASUU, therefore they deserve no pity, (as if they enjoyed that pity in their previous engagements with the government before). For declaring an indefinite strike in this time of global health crisis, these group of people feels ASUU has ignored the human catastrophe the world faces. They advised ASUU to call-off the strike and join the government in the fight against the Covid-19 pandemic. But come to think of it; are we expecting the problems ASUU is crying over to go, just because ASUU call off its strike? Or are we expecting all of us to die during this pandemic and the need to revive our universities will no longer be there? Truth is that; we are going to survive this pandemic, as we survived others before it, and we are going to come back to these problems – our problems in the educational sector already infected by HIV and AIDS by various Nigerian governments.

For us to understand ASUU and its struggles, we need to go back to how the Union was created in the first place. Formed in 1978, it came at a time when Nigeria was faced with economic crisis as a result of the decline of the oil boom. This was the time when university autonomy and academic freedom suffered serious blow from the military dictators of the time. The happenings around the world of an ideological war fare – the cold war between the capitalists’ world led by the USA and its Western Europe allies versus the Communists’ world led the Union of Soviet Socialists’ Republic (USSR) and its Eastern European allies. ASUU as a union was created to align with communists’ philosophy. Therefore, ASUU’s orientation is one of fighting for the common good, broad national issues and the Union stood firmly against oppressors and anti-people policies of these regimes. The choice of this stand was more of ideological than convenience.

The usurpation of academic freedom and university autonomy became worst during the civilian government of Shagari and the military regime of Major General Ibrahim Babangida. Many academics were sacked on the directives of the President without the right of hearing. It is natural for the regimes, whether civilian or military to hate ASUU. Because the Union remained the only stumbling block to the idea of commercializing the country’s public universities. This has been the intent of the government since 1978 universities’ reform, but ASUU remained resolute in opposing these edupreneurship tendencies.

Whenever ASUU go on strike, the government tries to turn the table against ASUU. Instead of discussing the issue ASUU take to the table, the government quickly circumvent around the problems and opt for a negative narrative. This is exactly what they did with the present dispute. After reneging on the 2018 MOA and their refusal to implement what they signed, they re-activated the dubious IPPIS platform and made it an issue. Using paid agents, they go to media to promote that ASUU is fighting IPPIS because they support corruption in the universities. They also made people to believe that ASUU’S struggles are guided by their greedy, self-centred campaign for “stomach infrastructure”. This false narrative has gained ground and accepted not only within the circle of unsuspecting innocent Nigerians, but even among educated elite. Quite often, you hear “educated” people saying, when it comes to ASUU struggle “what are these people looking for, when they are the highest paid public servants in Nigeria? Some of them, even those close to university pay-roll office, will be talking about a one million naira a month salary of a university professor. It is only when you engage them in discussion and get them educated that they will start apologizing and telling you actually “they thought”, – what a flimsy excuse?

We wish these people abusing ASUU for their “selfish, greedy, and corrupt tendencies” stayed behind in the university to help fight these things they accuse of, though coming back is not a bad idea. While most Comrades have moved to the other side of the divide, others were not even in this ideological school in the first place. It is when you understand the “education as public good” school of thought that one will appreciate what ASUU is fighting for. This, that is, providing education as public good,  ASUU believes should be provided by the state as a fundamental human rights. This is built on the idea that education should be public good based on the principle of respect for human life, human dignity, cultural diversity and social justice which was adopted by International Organisations like UNESCO and the United Nations Committee on Human Rights of the Child which Nigeria is signatory.

In 1999-2007, Obasanjo and his Bretton Wood agents came with a different plan. The agents, mostly recruited from World Bank and other western financial institutions intended to cancel the principle of collective bargaining, introduce tuition fees in the universities and retrench staff. This were all prelude to the commodification of education (from the edupreneurs’ school of thought). The idea was popularized then. However, ASUU as usual resisted this idea. Had it been Obasanjo 1978-1979, Shagari 1979-1984, Buhari 1984-1985, Babangida 1985-1993, Abacha 1993-1998 and Obasanjo 1999-2007 succeeded in the commercialization of the public university, those insulting, abusing and cursing ASUU would not have the basic literacy to even write. It is then that you will appreciate the struggles of ASUU. People who know little about these edupreneurs’ machinations, people who believe education can also be purchased like a designer shoe in a super market are the ones behind the castigation and insults of ASUU.

The painful part of all this is how most of our former comrades – “Marxist-Capitalist”, people who are direct beneficiaries of public education system have now joined the edupreneurs league and now are at fore front of the ASUU bashing. They have joined the government paid agents in promoting the narrative that a least paid university academic in Nigeria is earning nothing less than N200,000.00. The truth is that; a university professor, who spent 45 years working in the university earns between N380,000:00 to N420, 000.00. For 11 years now, the salary of university academics was not reviewed. That was 2009 and the implementation of the new salary scale came after the 2011 strike.

With this poor working condition, one wonder how words greed, ungrateful, corrupt became popular lexicons even among our students to describe ASUU on social media. For without ASUU strikes, there won’t be TETFUND or NEEDS assessment interventions. Then the few projects we see in our universities won’t be there. Universities in Nigeria would have joined their public primary and secondary schools’ sisters.

This is our reality; we either accept it or we continue our vituperations.

On the part of ASUU, I think this is time for re-strategising the fight. It may not be a welcome idea, but at a point ASUU as a Union has to be realistic with its struggles. ASUU can start by asking government if education on one hand and oil on the other hand are important to the economic development of Nigeria. If the answer is yes, then ASUU can ask the government to put university academics on the same salary scale with that of NNPC staff. When this is done, I don’t think we will have any industrial dispute concerning salary increase or unpaid allowances in the future. Then the fight now should be on forcing the government to revitalize its universities. ASUU strike will no longer be on its members’ welfare. If not, what ASUU is running from will actually catch up with it sooner or later.

Edupreneurs are gaining ground everyday as the number of academics who subscribed to these ASUU ideal keep on shrinking daily. Nigerians, it seems are in support of privatization of the public universities, at least from the way they abuse ASUU on public forums and the media.

Lawanti, a lecturer at Department of Mass Communication, ABU Zaria-Nigeria wrote via: [email protected]