Ebonyi: APC Attacks Judge, Slams ‘Travesty of Justice, Judicial Recklessness’

Ebonyi: APC Attacks Judge, Slams ‘Travesty of Justice, Judicial Recklessness’

By Kabir Akintayo

The All Progressives Congress (APC) has described the Federal High Court judgement on the defection of Governor Dave Umahi of Ebonyi state and his deputy, Kelechi Igwe, as a travesty of justice, a form of judicial recklessness that is dead on arrival.

APC accused the judge of giving a  controversial  judgement without quoting any section of the Constitution to support his decision.

In a statement signed by the Director (Publicity), Salisu Na’inna Ɗambatta, APC National Headquarters Abuja, on Tuesday, the party condemned the judgement and accrued the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) of masterminding the alleged illegality.

The court had earlier on Tuesday sacked Governor Umahi and his Deputy for defecting to the APC, saying the votes he won during the 2019 election were for the PDP and could not be legally transferred to the APC.

The APC statement read in part:

“Our attention has been drawn to  the judgement made by Hon Justice Inyang  Ekwo of Court 5 of the Federal High Court FCT, Abuja and the travesty of Justice occasioned by the recklessness of his Judicial decision.

“The crux of the matter is a  suit by People’s Democratic Party, PDP, seeking to sack the Governor of Ebonyi State ,His Excellency Engr Chief David Nweze Umahi FNSE FNATE (Akubaraoha) and his Deputy for  defecting to All Progressives Congress (APC). The parties raised issues for determination which all bother on whether or not defection to another political party  from a party that elected the Governor or his Deputy amounts to a breach of any section (s) of the constitution or the Electoral Act that should warrant a Judicial interpretation, raising declaratory and or injunctive orders against the Governor of a State and or his Deputy.

“The Presiding Judge committed a glaring judicial error by giving judgement sacking a duly elected and sworn-in Governor and his Deputy without relying on or citing any provision(s) of the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria or any provision of the Electoral Act that  empowers the court to sack a sitting Governor and or his Deputy. This is purely a travesty of Justice.

“The  Court failed, refused and or neglected to understand the clear difference between a Governorship  candidate of a Political Party as contemplated by the Electoral Act and a Governor of a State duly sworn in as contemplated by the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.The Court presided by Hon. Justice Inyang Ekwo further went ahead to rely on the outdated authority of Amaechi v INEC( Omehia case) without exercising the Judicial power of Judicial distinction between pre-election/electon matters and this matter of elected Governor defecting to another Political Party. He chose not to appreciate or he lacked the understanding of the difference between a Governor of a State and Governorship candidate of a Political Party.  The Electoral Act and the judgement in Amaechi v INEC  contemplated who is the right candidate of the Party and not the issue of defection, as you all know neither Amaechi nor Omehia raised issue of defection to another Political Party. So it is absolutely rediculous and questionable, as it shameful that a judge could decide  a weighty matter such as conditions for sacking the Governor of a State without  relying on any express provision of the Constitution or Electoral Act or Judicial Authority either of superior courts or even courts of coordinate jurisdiction.

“It will be noted that  a State High Court sitting in Ebonyi State presided by Hon Justice  Henry Njoku (who is more Senior in Bench  than Hon Justice Inyang Ekwo of the Federal High Court 5 Abuja)  has given judgement on the issues sought in this Ekwo Judgement). The Governor of Zamfara State  was recently given a clean bill of health in the matter for which this same  issue of defection was sought to be determined. In that case the Federal High Court, in its well considered judgement, stated that there is no provision in any law of the land or the Constitution of Nigeria that empowers any court in Nigeria to sack or tamper with the office of a  siting Governor and or Deputy for the reason of  defection to another political party.

“The constitution of Nigeria upholds the supremacy of the right of association of persons (even to defect from one political party to the other).  This is the prevailing position of the Supreme Court of Nigeria in the case of AG Fed & 2 ors v Alhaji Atiku Abubakar & 3 ors ( SC 31/2007) (2007) NGSC 118, 20th April 2007. The case interpreted the right of FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION to determine whether  the action of a Vice President abandoning the political party whose platform he and the President were elected and joining another Political Party without resigning, amounts to CONSTRUCTIVE RESIGNATION from office, to warrant the seat of the Vice President to be declared vacant.

“The Supreme Court held that the Vice President (the President , the Governor, the Deputy Governor) can can only vacate office  pursuant to section  306( resignation)  or sections 143 & 144 the Constitution of Nigeria which is parimateria with sections 188 & 189 of the same Constitution.

The Federal High Court sitting in Zamfra State has also relied on this Judicial Authority as the Law. In that case, the Court most recently held that Governor Bello Matawallle VIOLATED NO   provision of the Constitution of Nigeria and or PDP or APC’s constitution by his defection.

“We therefore urge the people of Ebonyi State, the associates and fans of the visionary Governor of Ebonyi State,His Excellency Engr Chief David Nweze Umahi FNSE FNATE (Akubaraoha) to go about their normal businesses and disregard the outcome of the Ekwo Judgement as being dead on arrival and having no iota of effect on the res of the matter as the Governor is sitting solidly and undistracted.”